Opinion by: Ignacio Aguirre Franco, Chief Marketing Officer at Bitget
Crypto’s next biggest challenge lies in something quieter – but more decisive – than black-swan hacks or market crashes: widespread user abandonment.
Predictions show that blockchain users could hit 1B+ by 2026, yet surveys show that only a small fraction actually trade or earn yield on a regular basis. Newcomers onboard fast, then bail. Crypto’s UX still feels like “prod-level debugging,” with multiple approvals just to swap or stake.
Vibe coding is the solution to this gap. Solo builders can now ship yield aggregators, trading bots, and dashboards in days, not months, thanks to faster tooling, modular infrastructure, and AI-assisted development. Exchanges that ignore it will not merely be “disrupted.” They will be bypassed.
Why now?
Tools like Cursor, Claude, and Lovable – a natural-language app builder with a $6.6B valuation – turn plain-English product descriptions into working code in minutes. Hyperliquid – an 11-person DEX – processed $3T volume in 2025, in part because builders vibe-coded trading tools atop their APIs.
Exchanges must enable this ecosystem. Whether they’re a CEX or DEX, exchanges are starting to confront the same reality: platforms that don’t build their data and APIs around intent‑driven, AI‑assisted workflows are the ones that see volume drift away to those that do.
What vibe coding actually is
Vibe coding collapses the distance between idea and execution. Users describe intent: “Set up yield across four chains” or “Build a CEX/DEX arb bot.” AI manages orderbook logic, gas optimization, and risk math. The interface feels conversational.
Hyperliquid demonstrates this in practice: solo builders ship Hyperscalper – a professional scalping terminal – in weeks via their APIs and AI-assisted workflows. Work that once took teams months. Across its ecosystem, over 180 active builders have earned around $74M in revenue – fueling a self-reinforcing flywheel where tools attract more users, which in turn attract more tools.
This is not just a convenience for quants. It lowers the barrier for retail traders and developers to build and test strategies that would otherwise require months of upfront engineering.
If DeFi protocols are becoming the backbone of vibe‑coded trading, more universal platforms – those that combine traditional financial infrastructure with crypto exchanges – must become the front line: the place where users first discover, test, and trust these tools without needing to understand the underlying stack.
For a platform like ours, this means owning more than just liquidity: it means owning the clarity that turns natural‑language strategies into execution. The real work is making AI‑assisted flows feel safe and transparent – always anchored in institutional‑grade security and risk controls.
The rise of agent-driven trading
Vibe coding powers agent ecosystems like Bitget’s Agent Hub, where developers connect AI agents to trading infrastructure through APIs, skills, and the bgc CLI command-line tool. The bgc CLI lets developers call Bitget’s full API suite directly from shell commands with JSON output, ideal for automation scripts and AI agent workflows.
Agents like Claude Code automatically detect trading intent and execute spot, futures, and copy trades via natural language prompts. MCP tools enable LLMs to invoke exchange capabilities natively. This bridges conversational intent to live market execution.
The implication is clear: over time, more agents will trade than humans. The amount of data, the speed of execution, and the 24/7 nature of markets simply outpace what any human can manage manually. Humans will define objectives, risk tolerances, and guardrails; agents, activated and refined through vibe coding, will handle the action.
Exchanges that do not build for this agent‑centric world will be left to serve the shrinking minority of fully manual traders, while the bulk of volume migrates to platforms that embrace automated, intent‑driven workflows.
Why it matters for exchanges
Exchanges bridge protocol complexity and user patience. Many exchanges still cling to the UX mindset of 2015: nested menus, wall‑of‑text warning banners, and flows that assume everyone thinks like a developer. It’s no surprise, then, that so many users drop off within their first 90days, or admit they simply don’t understand how the platform works.
On Hyperliquid, much of the $3T in 2025 volume flowed through builder‑built frontends powered by its APIs, increasingly making the native UI a fallback option for advanced users rather than the primary path.
Vibe coding transforms adoption:
- Natural language yields executable strategies
- “Cross-chain arb bot” becomes a 10-minute workflow
- AI pre-validates risk, explains errors
To be clear: this is not about “dumbing down” the product. It’s about moving from a developer‑centric model to a user‑centric one.
Counterargument and why it fails
“Vibe coding = insecure black box contracts.” Critics raise valid concerns: AI-generated Solidity can ship vulnerabilities to mainnet, unaudited bots risk exploits.
Yet today’s UX already demands a level of blind trust – wallet signatures users don’t read, unauditable frontends. Vibe coding done right layers in simulations, audit trails, and pre-deployment reviews. Exchanges must provide institutional-grade risk controls beneath conversational interfaces.
Speed doesn’t replace safety; it democratizes it. The goal is not to remove responsibility, but to redistribute it so that AI‑assisted flows are as rigorously managed as any traditional trading stack.
The point of no return
VCs chase ‘imagination and shipping’ over raw coding skill. Exchanges – including universal ones that combine traditional and digital assets – must claim the intent layer, making vibe-coded strategies discoverable, safe, and institutionally sound.
Exchanges without vibe coding will be left behind. Builders and agents route volume to platforms that turn intent into execution, while others fade into execution-only relics.
